Security posture you can actually show.
Policies, controls, evidence and incident records against ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIST and CERT-In - so the answer to "how secure are you?" is a report rather than a conversation.
Security work exists. The proof of it usually does not.
Controls get implemented by engineers and then described, months later, by somebody filling in a questionnaire from memory.
- Policies live in documents nobody reads. An unversioned policy in a shared drive is not a control, and an auditor will treat it accordingly.
- Evidence is collected twice, or late. The same screenshot gets gathered for ISO 27001, then again for SOC 2, then again for a customer's security review.
- You cannot see where PII sits. Personal data spreads into systems nobody classified, which is both a security and a DPDP problem.
- Incidents are handled but not recorded. CERT-In has reporting expectations. A resolved incident with no timeline is still an exposure.
The security programme, instrumented.
Each of these is a working part of the Niyam platform.
Managed policy library
Versioned policies mapped to the controls they satisfy, with review dates and approval records.
PII scanning
Locate personal data across connected systems so classification reflects reality, not an old diagram.
Control library & testing
Pre-loaded controls with owners, test procedures and evidence attached to each one.
Cross-framework mapping
One control satisfies ISO 27001, SOC 2 and NIST at once instead of being evidenced three times.
Incident records
Log incidents with awareness time, severity and response, aligned to CERT-In reporting expectations.
Audit packs
Generate the evidence bundle an auditor or an enterprise buyer asks for, on demand.
From scattered security work to a provable posture.
Adopt the control library
Start from pre-loaded controls for the frameworks you carry rather than authoring a set from scratch.
Attach policies and owners
Version each policy against the controls it satisfies, and give every control a named owner.
Collect evidence once
Cross-framework mapping means a single piece of evidence counts everywhere it applies.
Report on demand
Posture views for the board, audit packs for assessors, and answers for customer security reviews.
What improves.
Security stops being re-described for every audience and starts being reported from one source.
- Evidence collected once, used across every framework
- Policies versioned, approved and mapped to controls
- Personal data located rather than assumed
- Incident timelines recorded as they happen
- Customer security reviews answered from a report
- Audit preparation measured in days, not months
The security frameworks buyers and regulators ask about.
Frameworks are what Niyam helps you operationalise. They are not separate products.
Part of the Compliance Platform.
Cybersecurity posture, the policy library and control evidence are part of the Niyam Compliance Platform. Some modules depend on your plan - the pricing page shows current limits, read live from our product catalogue. Penetration testing is a separate service.
Questions about cybersecurity.
No. Posture management and penetration testing are different things. VAPT is delivered as a service by our security team and is scoped separately.
No. Some modules, such as PII scanning and the policy library, depend on your plan. The pricing page reads current entitlements directly from our product catalogue, so what you see there is authoritative.
Niyam runs the programme and produces the evidence. Certification itself is issued by an accredited external auditor, not by us.
Yes. Audit packs and control evidence give you a consistent, sourced answer rather than a fresh draft each time.
Stop describing your security. Show it.
Start free on the Compliance Platform, or talk to us about a penetration test.